REFERENCES
Evaluation of Nutrient Addition of Various Low-Cost Carbon Substrates
Donovan Smith, P.E. (JRW Bioremediation) and Michael R. Sieczkowski, CHMM
(JRW Bioremediation) Ninth International In Situ and On-Site Bioremediation Symposium, Baltimore, Maryland; May 7–10,
2007
Side-by-Side Comparison of Whey and Ethyl Lactate Substrates for Reductive Dechlorination
Michael R. Sieczkowski (JRW Bioremediation), Donovan Smith, P.E. (JRW Bioremediation), Peter Guerra (AMEC), and Jack Sheldon (AMEC) Sixth International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Monterey,
CA; May 2008
In Situ Treatment of Chlorinated Ethenes at the Treasure Island Site 24 Source Area
Michael Yurovsky, P.E. (Shaw E&I) and Scott D. Anderson (NAVFAC) Seventh International Conference Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds,
Monterey, California; May 24-27, 2010
![]()
It is well known that a consortium of microbes is needed for complete degradation of PCE or TCE to ethene. Because each of these microbes may have its own nutrient requirements, a single limiting nutrient may not be applicable to heterogeneous groundwater populations. A blend of nutrients is therefore preferred
(Swindoll, C.M, et all., 1988. AEM, Vol 54, p 212-217)

Effective Economical
Increase your donor efficiency and kinetics
| BENEFITS
EFFECTIVE
ECONOMICAL
|
USES
DONOR ENHANCED:
CONTAMINANTS TREATED:
| ||||||||||
| MICROCOSM STUDY RESULTS | |||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
| Typical biomass response to substrate input without Accelerite® - one magnitude of increase seen after 90 days. | Biomass response with Accelerite®, 2 orders of magnitude increase is seen after only 12 days. | ||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
| Estimated efficiency increased over 5 times with addition of Accelerite® (estimated efficiency calculated as umoles electron donor used for dechlorination divided by the as umoles of electron donor added). | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
HOME PRODUCTS CASE STUDIES TECHNICAL CONFERENCES CONTACT NEWS

